Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donna Van Gogh's Artists' Market

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tony Fox (arf!) 18:53, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Donna Van Gogh's Artists' Market

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

borderline speedy. Promotional and non-notable. No usable references. DGG ( talk ) 22:46, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - article is promotional in nature. The only reliable source I could find is a minor mention here. -- Whpq (talk) 15:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – Ty 11:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per both. Johnbod (talk) 15:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of above. Did anyone else catch the claim that she's Vincent's sibling? JNW (talk) 15:46, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A good article that just needs some work. Bus stop (talk) 18:59, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom...Hmmm must be his long lost great, great, great grandchild I guess...Modernist (talk) 21:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the lack of reliable sources. Having searched Google Books and Google News Archive, I have been unable to find anything substantial. This Google Books result, which provides insignificant coverage, is the best source I could find. Cunard (talk) 05:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.